IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v47y2024i1p106-123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Invariance analysis across industry sub-groups using the end user computing satisfaction instrument

Author

Listed:
  • Alagirisamy Kamatchi Subbiah Sukumaran

Abstract

Reliable comparisons on end user satisfaction could be drawn through invariance analysis when different applications and population sub-groups used a standardised instrument. The present study tested the measurement invariance of the end user computing satisfaction (EUCS) instrument among the industry sub-groups of a university, a manufacturing organisation, and a hospital in order to consider the scale as a standard instrument to measure the end user satisfaction in information technology and its applications. The invariance of user satisfaction based upon the population sub-groups of age, gender, and work experience and management position were also tested across these industry sub-groups. The EUCS instrument was found to be robust for the measurement of the first order factors of end user satisfaction, content, accuracy, format, ease of use and timeliness. However, the analysis revealed that the instrument required revision of the factors for the measurement of 'end user satisfaction'.

Suggested Citation

  • Alagirisamy Kamatchi Subbiah Sukumaran, 2024. "Invariance analysis across industry sub-groups using the end user computing satisfaction instrument," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 47(1), pages 106-123.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:47:y:2024:i:1:p:106-123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=142187
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:47:y:2024:i:1:p:106-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.