IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v46y2024i1p56-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumers' intention to use self-checkout technology in a retail context: a comparison of alternative competing models

Author

Listed:
  • Nasir Abdul Jalil
  • Kian Yeik Koay

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate consumers' intention to use self-checkout systems in a retailing context using three different theories, namely the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), the technology acceptance model (TAM) and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). This study used cross-sectional data collected from university students (N = 283) to validate the proposed hypotheses to compare the multiple theoretical models by using partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Results showed that the UTAUT outperformed the TPB and the TAM in terms of predictive power. This study contributed to the body of knowledge by investigating the explanatory power and predictive relevance of three different theoretical models in understanding and predicting consumers' intention to use self-checkout within a retailing context.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasir Abdul Jalil & Kian Yeik Koay, 2024. "Consumers' intention to use self-checkout technology in a retail context: a comparison of alternative competing models," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 46(1), pages 56-72.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:46:y:2024:i:1:p:56-72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=138552
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:46:y:2024:i:1:p:56-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.