IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v25y2017i3p279-318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Holistic procedures for contemporary formative construct validation using PLS: a comprehensive example

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad A. Rabaa'i

Abstract

Sound advice from knowledgeable methodologists synthesised from the literature, has yielded herein a complete and readily useable set of guidelines for best-practice contemporary formative construct validation using partial least squares (PLS). Procedures are logically organised around the indicator level and construct level validation. Indicator level validation is concerned that each indicator contributes to the formative construct by carrying the intended meaning. Tests advocated are in attention to: 1) multicollinearity; 2) indicator weights; 3) indicator loadings; 4) indicator criterion validity. Construct level validation includes tests of: 1) nomological validity; 2) external validity. The referent study conveniently included items whose statistical indications were mixed, inviting illuminating discussion around the basis on which key decisions are made. Guidance compiled herein and demonstrated through example, will be of value to both novice and more experienced researchers working with or considering formative phenomenon. The combination of procedures outlined makes clear the necessary data and tests required in order to facilitate strong formative construct validity testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad A. Rabaa'i, 2017. "Holistic procedures for contemporary formative construct validation using PLS: a comprehensive example," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(3), pages 279-318.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:25:y:2017:i:3:p:279-318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=84436
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:25:y:2017:i:3:p:279-318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.