IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v25y2017i2p165-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing and validating the ERP success evaluation model for higher education institutes of Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Sehrish Nizamani
  • Khalil Khoumbati
  • Imdad Ali Ismaili
  • Saad Nizamani
  • Sarwat Nizamani
  • Nazish Basir

Abstract

Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan has taken profound measures to bring significant improvement in universities of Pakistan. HEC signed an agreement with Oracle PeopleSoft to equip universities with high-tech information technology (IT) solutions. To this end, HEC initially implemented enterprise resource planning (ERP) campus management system in seven universities of Pakistan as a pilot project. However, there is a void in literature to evaluate these ERP implementations. This research formulates a conceptual model based on strong background theories to effectively evaluate the success of ERP system implementation. A questionnaire based online survey approach is used to collect data from 323 respondents. Findings of the paper result in a refined model for analysing success of ERP implementation. By employing this model, the paper also reports on the success and failure of ERP implementation. Finally, the undertaken study implies that its findings may substantially add regarding the future decisions of ERP implementations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sehrish Nizamani & Khalil Khoumbati & Imdad Ali Ismaili & Saad Nizamani & Sarwat Nizamani & Nazish Basir, 2017. "Testing and validating the ERP success evaluation model for higher education institutes of Pakistan," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(2), pages 165-191.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:25:y:2017:i:2:p:165-191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=83682
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:25:y:2017:i:2:p:165-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.