IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v24y2017i1p91-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating classification accuracy: the impact of resampling and dataset size

Author

Listed:
  • Jehad Imlawi
  • Mohammad Alsharo

Abstract

Correct prediction is important criterion in evaluating classifiers in supervised learning context. The accuracy rate is a widely accepted indicator of the probability of misclassification of a classifier. Nevertheless, true accuracy remains unknown in most cases since it is not always possible to include the whole population in a study, and it is difficult to calculate the probability distribution of the data. Therefore, researchers often rely on computing estimation from the available data through sampling. When the available data is small or limited, it is common to rely on a resampling technique for accuracy estimation. In this paper, we study the impact of the resampling against non-resampling estimation method, with different dataset sizes on the sample distribution variance. Initial results indicate that there is a significant difference in the variance of the sample distribution between resampling and non-resampling. We also found that the larger the dataset size, the less significant the difference in variance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jehad Imlawi & Mohammad Alsharo, 2017. "Evaluating classification accuracy: the impact of resampling and dataset size," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(1), pages 91-101.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:24:y:2017:i:1:p:91-101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=80947
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:24:y:2017:i:1:p:91-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.