IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v23y2016i3p330-352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A theoretical and methodological examination of knowledge management maturity models: a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Mona Jami Pour
  • Amir Manian
  • Hamid Reza Yazdani

Abstract

Two decades ago, researches related to maturity models have grown increasingly. Investigating theoretical basics of maturity models in knowledge management (KM) field and revealing the gaps in this domain are challenging tasks for researchers. Until today, no studies have been available summarising the theoretical foundations, methods and results of KM maturity models. To gain research objective, systematic literature review was conducted in related studies from valid scientific databases during 2000 to 2014. In this study, in addition to addressing KM paradigms generally, theoretical foundations of KM maturity researches have also been examined. The results show that functionalist is the prominent paradigm while this paradigm has been criticised in many IS researches. Researchers can use the findings as starting point for developing a new KM maturity model. The main research contribution is structuring available literature of KM maturity models to identify their theoretical foundations as well as research gaps via a systematic way.

Suggested Citation

  • Mona Jami Pour & Amir Manian & Hamid Reza Yazdani, 2016. "A theoretical and methodological examination of knowledge management maturity models: a systematic review," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(3), pages 330-352.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:23:y:2016:i:3:p:330-352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=79525
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:23:y:2016:i:3:p:330-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.