IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbire/v8y2014i6p598-612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical investigation of quality performance expectations in the software industry: a gap analysis approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Mehrez

Abstract

The assessment of quality is pervasive but vital in organisations. It is particularly important in the design of an effective quality management system. The assessment is often considered from the perspective of fulfilling customers' requirements; however, the level of compatibility between a product or service providers' perceptions of what to deliver and the customers' desires or expectations is often uncertain. This paper describes an empirical study evaluating, within the software industry in Egypt, the extent to which differences, or 'gaps', may exist between software provider perceptions and customer expectations regarding the levels of ideal and actual degrees of performance within multiple dimensions of quality. The study involved a survey of 142 software developer and 111 software customers where gaps were found to exist across nine measured dimensions of quality. These gaps were found to be both statistically and practically significant. The existence of such quality performance gaps is often not measured. These gaps, however, must be firstly measured and recognised, then secondly addressed within an organisation otherwise there will exist 'flaws' within the design and implementation of the organisation's quality management programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Mehrez, 2014. "An empirical investigation of quality performance expectations in the software industry: a gap analysis approach," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(6), pages 598-612.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:8:y:2014:i:6:p:598-612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=65487
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:8:y:2014:i:6:p:598-612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=203 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.