IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbire/v7y2013i3p279-297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do agency concerns inhibit internationalisation of family owned firms?: a comparative study of the USA and Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Harinder Singh
  • Joanna Wyrobek

Abstract

Although family firms are a dominant part of the industrial landscape in the USA and Poland, they normally do not capitalise on international opportunities. We hypothesise that the lack of internationalisation is primarily due to agency concerns such as losing control of executive power, difficulty in external coordination, and diluting the firm's mission. We investigate the structural and cultural differences of family firms in the USA and Poland based on sample surveys. A more comprehensive definition of family firms is employed based on the F-PEC scale of power, experience, and culture. Preliminary survey results indicate that agency concerns are substantial in both countries and could be a major impediment to internationalisation. Moreover, family firms generally prefer a low control mode of entry such as a sales agreement/representative, supporting the incremental approach to internationalisation. The main driver for internationalisation seems to be the lure of expanding markets rather than lower costs of production.

Suggested Citation

  • Harinder Singh & Joanna Wyrobek, 2013. "Do agency concerns inhibit internationalisation of family owned firms?: a comparative study of the USA and Poland," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 279-297.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:7:y:2013:i:3:p:279-297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=53632
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:7:y:2013:i:3:p:279-297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=203 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.