IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbire/v5y2011i6p663-684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Write it or click on it? Paper vs. online questionnaires for organisational research

Author

Listed:
  • Ambika Zutshi
  • Melissa A. Parris
  • Andrew Creed

Abstract

In the last few decades, researchers have made the shift from using traditional paper-based survey questionnaires to develop online surveys to be more contemporary and digitally inclusive. The historical use of paper-based questionnaires has produced a large body of literature on both the advantages and disadvantages, which are reviewed in this paper alongside those of online survey questionnaires. We posit that the traditional methods of increasing survey response rates in paper format should not be blindly ignored in the quest to utilise online methodology. Rather, our view is that researchers could exploit the true benefits of online technologies and increase response rate by thoughtfully combining traditional and new methods. We recommend that further discussion and research are required in order to identify the benefits and weaknesses of using electronic methods of data collection. This will ensure that potential short-term cost savings are not outweighed by either financial or participation costs as part of online survey questionnaire design.

Suggested Citation

  • Ambika Zutshi & Melissa A. Parris & Andrew Creed, 2011. "Write it or click on it? Paper vs. online questionnaires for organisational research," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(6), pages 663-684.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:5:y:2011:i:6:p:663-684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43204
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:5:y:2011:i:6:p:663-684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=203 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.