IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbire/v34y2024i3p342-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organisational justice as antecedent to innovative work behaviour: a systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Anu Singh Lather
  • Simran Kaur

Abstract

This study aimed to examine and evaluate the qualities of the studies highlighting the impact of organisational justice on innovative work. The 'preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) ' criteria were used to conduct this study. These principles ensure that reviews and meta-analyses are conducted methodically and transparently. A total of 43 primary studies from the years 2000 to 2021 were selected and examined. It was found that all the dimensions of organisational justice (distributive, interactional, and procedural justice) play a significant role in explaining deviance in employees' perception towards organisation's climate towards creativity. Based on the current research, the existing theoretical frameworks can be improved. Researchers can use empirical methods to test the relationship established between organisational justice perception and innovative work behaviour. In addition, moderating effects of different organisational factors like leadership style, knowledge sharing, conflict management, organisational learning capacity can be analysed to better understand the relationship between organisational justice perception and innovative work behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Anu Singh Lather & Simran Kaur, 2024. "Organisational justice as antecedent to innovative work behaviour: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 34(3), pages 342-369.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:34:y:2024:i:3:p:342-369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=139232
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:34:y:2024:i:3:p:342-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=203 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.