IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbire/v24y2021i3p364-384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why have not minimills disrupted the Indian steel incumbents?

Author

Listed:
  • Chakunnath Madhusudan
  • Ramasamy Panneerselvam

Abstract

The theory of disruptive innovation successfully explained how incumbent integrated steel plants in the US were toppled by entrants using the disruptive minimill technology using steel scrap. The post liberalisation Indian steel sector has been dominated by new steelmakers, many of them using latest minimill technologies. Yet these entrants have not been able to dislodge the Indian integrated steel plant incumbents. Our research finds crucial differences between the evolution of the Indian and US Steel sectors. We find that availability of steel scrap is crucial for minimills to become a disruptive technology, which is lacking in India at the moment. We predict the disruption of Indian incumbents if they ignore steel scrap input technologies in the coming years.

Suggested Citation

  • Chakunnath Madhusudan & Ramasamy Panneerselvam, 2021. "Why have not minimills disrupted the Indian steel incumbents?," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(3), pages 364-384.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:24:y:2021:i:3:p:364-384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=113516
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiu, Ziyang & Sun, Jingchao & Du, Tao & Na, Hongming & Zhang, Lei & Yuan, Yuxing & Wang, Yisong, 2024. "Impact of hydrogen metallurgy on the current iron and steel industry: A comprehensive material-exergy-emission flow analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:24:y:2021:i:3:p:364-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=203 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.