IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbire/v21y2020i1p56-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antecedents and outcomes of service recovery satisfaction: perspectives on open and distance learning in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Rushidi Bin Mohd Amin
  • Shishi Kumar Piaralal

Abstract

Researchers and practitioners in higher education often pay less attention to service recovery compared to service quality or customer satisfaction particularly in the context of open and distance learning (ODL) in Malaysia. More importantly, the outcomes of service recovery satisfaction are often given less emphasis by the ODL institutions and often focused on delivering services with the approach of getting it right the first time. Service failure is inevitable and when the service delivery fails at some point, the whole process will be disrupted, and the students will be dissatisfied. This is where service recovery through justice dimensions play its part. In this study, the relationship between justice dimensions (procedural, distribution, interpersonal and informational justice), service recovery satisfaction, and behavioural outcomes are being explored and the moderating effects of corporate image in the Malaysian ODL context are also being looked at and examined in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Rushidi Bin Mohd Amin & Shishi Kumar Piaralal, 2020. "Antecedents and outcomes of service recovery satisfaction: perspectives on open and distance learning in Malaysia," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(1), pages 56-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:21:y:2020:i:1:p:56-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=104034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:21:y:2020:i:1:p:56-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=203 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.