IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbglo/v15y2015i4p461-474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferred leadership behaviours by different personalities

Author

Listed:
  • Piia Uusi-Kakkuri
  • Tiina Brandt

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the degree to which different personalities prefer different kinds of leadership. Finnish participants (n = 360) completed a leadership questionnaire compiled with reference to Bass's MLQ, Kouzes and Posner's LPI, and leadership literature overall. The subjects also had their personality type determined with the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Several results were found; there were statistically significant results in all preference pairs. For example, people with extraverted, intuitive and feeling preferences wanted to see transformational behaviours even more so than the people with opposite preference pairs. All personality preferences would rather have a transactional or authoritative leader than a non-leader. Rewarding behaviours are important across the board, but not as important as transformational behaviours. Sensing followers were more inclined to have an authoritative or transactional leader than intuitive ones, and introverted followers were slightly more comfortable with laissez-faire style behaviours than their extraverted counterparts were. These findings provide a good opening for research considering individuals' expectations of their leader, and they should be considered in human resource development, leadership training and relationship conflicts. Leaders' and followers' relationships are crucial and organisations would be wise to forestall any unnecessary clashes within them.

Suggested Citation

  • Piia Uusi-Kakkuri & Tiina Brandt, 2015. "Preferred leadership behaviours by different personalities," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(4), pages 461-474.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:15:y:2015:i:4:p:461-474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=72518
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:15:y:2015:i:4:p:461-474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=245 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.