IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbget/v18y2024i6p702-732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mind the gap: impact of formal institutional distance and human rights differences between the host and home countries on emerging market multinationals' choice of ownership strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Rekha Rao-Nicholson
  • Liudmyla Svystunova

Abstract

Recent decades have witnessed a rapid expansion of emerging-market multinational enterprises' (EMNEs). These newly internationalising firms are faced with challenges as they go abroad. One of the sources of this challenge is the gap between codified formal institutions and the extent to which they are upheld in practice. Drawing on recent critiques, we explore the links between EMNEs' ownership strategy, the difference in the host-home countries in terms of the formal institutions and mediating role of human rights. Our analysis draws on the data for EMNEs from five emerging markets, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, between 1998-2011. The results suggest a partial mediation effect of human rights difference on the formal institutional distance and EMNEs' ownership stakes, namely, when EMNEs acquired targets in the developed countries. Thus, our study contributes to the literature by evidencing the effect of formal institutions being transmitted via human rights differences between home and host countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Rekha Rao-Nicholson & Liudmyla Svystunova, 2024. "Mind the gap: impact of formal institutional distance and human rights differences between the host and home countries on emerging market multinationals' choice of ownership strategy," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(6), pages 702-732.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:18:y:2024:i:6:p:702-732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=141810
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:18:y:2024:i:6:p:702-732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=70 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.