IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbget/v14y2020i2p166-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between organisational virtue and perceived role of ethics and perception of social responsibility in business: testing a mediation model

Author

Listed:
  • Noor Jehan
  • Summan Gull
  • Naseer Abbas Khan
  • Abrar Hussain

Abstract

Organisational ethics and organisational responsibility culture are interdependent, and therefore these ethics and responsibilities respond to internal or external stimuli. This study investigates the influence of organisational virtue (OV) on the perceived role of ethics (PRE) and perception of social responsibility (PSR) and explores the association between OV and organisational efficacy (OE) in the banking sector. This study also examines the mediating effects of OE on the association between OV and PRE in business and the association between OV and PSR. A convenience sampling method is employed in the cross-sectional study of 322 employees and their supervisors in 83 branches of banks in the eastern provinces of China. Results showed that OV exerts a positive influence on OE, PSR, and PRE in business. Similarly, OE significantly mediates the association between OV and the association between OV and PSR in the banking sector. This work provides several implications and future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Noor Jehan & Summan Gull & Naseer Abbas Khan & Abrar Hussain, 2020. "Relationship between organisational virtue and perceived role of ethics and perception of social responsibility in business: testing a mediation model," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(2), pages 166-180.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:14:y:2020:i:2:p:166-180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=106335
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:14:y:2020:i:2:p:166-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=70 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.