IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v5y2012i4p305-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A knowledge management metrics model for measuring strategy implementation success

Author

Listed:
  • Okfalisa
  • Rose Alinda Alias
  • Kuan Yew Wong
  • Siong Choy Chong

Abstract

Many organisations fail to implement their strategies due to the inability of stakeholders in addressing the problems associated with strategy implementation. This paper aims to support their ability and involvement in solving these problems as well as measure the success of strategy implementation through the development of a knowledge management metrics model. This model comprised a set of 33 indicators, grouped into two metrics to measure the success of strategy implementation. The importance of the proposed indicators was theoretically discussed and justified through interview and survey conducted in the Malaysian higher education sector. In addition, a quantitative statistical analysis was performed to confirm this model. The overall results from the empirical evaluation were positive, thus indicating the appropriateness of this model. The crucial indicators were discussed so that managers can devote more attention to these elements. Furthermore, the key actors that influence the success of strategy implementation were also identified. For Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), the model can aid them to measure their strategy implementation and increase their education quality. It can guide the top and middle managers in making decisions to support the achievement of strategy implementation success.

Suggested Citation

  • Okfalisa & Rose Alinda Alias & Kuan Yew Wong & Siong Choy Chong, 2012. "A knowledge management metrics model for measuring strategy implementation success," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 305-322.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:5:y:2012:i:4:p:305-322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=47902
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:5:y:2012:i:4:p:305-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.