IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v5y2012i1-2p35-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Essentials of D-phase to secure the competitive advantage through Six Sigma

Author

Listed:
  • Bikram Jit Singh
  • Dinesh Khanduja

Abstract

Present work is a conceptual paper that takes an in-depth look at the origins, advantages and disadvantages of Six Sigma and describes how it relates to some of the other quality initiatives in industry. DMAIC strategy of Six Sigma is briefly explained and realised the significance of define (D)-phase, specifically. Various prospects have been formulated to understand the reason of failure of Six Sigma particularly in SMEs and found that 'malfunctioning of define step' is one of the major reason among them. It highlights the framework for define phase and suggested a more applicable form of bifurcation as far as define tools and techniques are concerned. A road map for short listing the relevant define tools have been carpeted especially for academicians, industrialists and professional statisticians. A case study in a medium scale non-ferrous foundry has been conducted which has witnessed the effectiveness of suggested concept. The whole manuscript revolves around the initial step of DMAIC methodology of Six Sigma and uncovers various threats and hazards of skipping this phase. The simulated framework emphasises the D-phase only and falls short to discuss other four phases of the methodology and further generates a scope for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Bikram Jit Singh & Dinesh Khanduja, 2012. "Essentials of D-phase to secure the competitive advantage through Six Sigma," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1/2), pages 35-51.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:5:y:2012:i:1/2:p:35-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44572
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:5:y:2012:i:1/2:p:35-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.