IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v34y2024i2p201-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electronic word-of-mouth in the hospitality industry: a comparative study in top hotels

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Asenova
  • Juan Llopis
  • Jose Gasco
  • Reyes Gonzalez

Abstract

Academic researchers have demonstrated the increasing importance of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in recent decades as part of the technological development of the internet. The nature of the hospitality industry means that eWOM has much more influence in comparison with other market sectors. This study aims to analyse eWOM and its main impact in the context of the 150 top hotels and hotel groups included in the latest annual report 'Hotels 325'. The study has two main scopes. The first is the evaluation and justification of the increasing importance of eWOM in the hotel industry. The second is the comparative evaluation of the feedback received by customers using Tripadvisor, one of the most influential platforms, by categorising and quantifying the obtained results. A specific conceptual model including different hypotheses was created to support the main scopes. A regression correlation matrix (Pearson and Spearman) was also introduced to measure the relationship of the results. The conclusions show the overall result of the study and its limitations. The outcome of the research supports the implemented hypothesis and the linear relationship between the values.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Asenova & Juan Llopis & Jose Gasco & Reyes Gonzalez, 2024. "Electronic word-of-mouth in the hospitality industry: a comparative study in top hotels," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 34(2), pages 201-225.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:34:y:2024:i:2:p:201-225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=141640
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:34:y:2024:i:2:p:201-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.