IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v2y2009i1p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employees satisfied with performance measurement and rewards: is it even possible?

Author

Listed:
  • Juhani Ukko
  • Jussi Karhu
  • Sanna Pekkola

Abstract

The motivational influence of performance-related rewards has been highlighted in the earlier literature on Performance Measurement (PM). This paper focuses on the linkage between participation in decision-making and the success of rewarding. The study is quantitative and the empirical evidence is based on a survey that was carried out in eight companies that operated in the manufacturing industry in 2005. To ensure an overall view, the survey was conducted with all employees of the studied companies. On the basis of the statistical analysis, it can be stated that the more autonomy in work that people have, the more successful they perceive the motivational influence of rewarding. The study suggests that companies should pay attention to the autonomy of employees in their work and, thus, ensure the successful use of performance-related rewarding.

Suggested Citation

  • Juhani Ukko & Jussi Karhu & Sanna Pekkola, 2009. "Employees satisfied with performance measurement and rewards: is it even possible?," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 1-15.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:2:y:2009:i:1:p:1-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=21587
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nijsiree Vongariyajit & Sooksan Kantabutra, 2021. "A Test of the Sustainability Vision Theory: Is It Practical?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:2:y:2009:i:1:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.