IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v28y2022i4p505-521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A critical analysis of Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 (CAA)

Author

Listed:
  • Brij Mohan Dutta

Abstract

India is a parliamentary democracy and primary function of the Parliament is to legislate. In India, the Constitution is supreme; and the Supreme Court is the final interpreter of the law. It is a sovereign right of a nation to determine whom to allow to settle and work. Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 (CAA) is the event in the Parliamentary History of India which has created so much uproar. In this research paper the concept of citizenship, its relevance in context of our freedom struggle till today. The history, problem, state and reasons of religious persecution of minorities of six religious communities i.e., Hindu, Sikh, Jain, Buddhist, Parsi and Christian in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh are examined. The paper analyses why CAA is limited to only three countries and only to six religious communities, validity of CAA, and effects of CAA on Indians, foreigners and on Muslims from these three countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Brij Mohan Dutta, 2022. "A critical analysis of Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 (CAA)," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 28(4), pages 505-521.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:28:y:2022:i:4:p:505-521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=127500
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nadia Rehman & Xiao Huang & Li Zhang & Amir Mahmood & Noushin Zamani, 2024. "Breaking the stigma: the joint effort of the government, print media, and citizens toward transgender education equality (2018–2022)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:28:y:2022:i:4:p:505-521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.