IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v18y2019i1p98-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of poison pills by US firms over the period 1997-2015: what has been their impact on shareholder value?

Author

Listed:
  • Duarte Pitta Ferraz
  • Ilídio Tomás Lopes
  • Simon Hitzelberger

Abstract

Poison pills are controversial devices for which no common conclusion as to how the market reacts to their adoption exists. This research collates 4,479 poison pill adoption events by US companies over the period 1997-2015. Statistically significant insights and positive abnormal returns were found on the day the poison pill was adopted. It is for this reason that we argue in favour of the shareholder wealth-maximisation hypothesis, stating that poison pills protect shareholders by providing management a superior bargaining position. The shareholders react positively to poison pill adoption, particularly if a hostile takeover attempt is anticipated. Furthermore, shareholders seem to value the protective effect of the device, which both provides management a superior bargaining position and allows the maximal possible bid premium to be negotiated.

Suggested Citation

  • Duarte Pitta Ferraz & Ilídio Tomás Lopes & Simon Hitzelberger, 2019. "The use of poison pills by US firms over the period 1997-2015: what has been their impact on shareholder value?," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(1), pages 98-119.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:18:y:2019:i:1:p:98-119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=99450
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:18:y:2019:i:1:p:98-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.