IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v13y2017i4p441-458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of perceived organisational support on organisational citizenship behaviour: the mediating role of organisational trust

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Nasr Isfahani
  • Ali Rezaei

Abstract

This study examines the relationships between perceived organisational support (POS), organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) and organisational trust; and the mediating role of organisational trust on perceived organisational support and OCB. The population under study were all experts from National Iranian Drilling Company among whom 158 questionnaires were distributed. Of these 158 questionnaires, 146 questionnaires were completed; of these completed questionnaires, six were excluded, because many items were left unanswered. Finally, 140 questionnaires were analysed. Results showed that there is a positive significant relationship between perceived organisational support and OCB and organisational trust. There is a positive significant relationship between OCB and organisational. Also, the meditating role of organisational trust is supported in relation to the perceived organisational support and OCB. The results of PLS show that the baseline model is supported.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Nasr Isfahani & Ali Rezaei, 2017. "The impact of perceived organisational support on organisational citizenship behaviour: the mediating role of organisational trust," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(4), pages 441-458.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:13:y:2017:i:4:p:441-458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=87754
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:13:y:2017:i:4:p:441-458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.