IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v11y2017i2p221-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of total employee involvement: a case study of a cutting tool company

Author

Listed:
  • Nagarajan Ramesh
  • A. Ravi

Abstract

This research paper explains a case study conducted to examine the factors that influence total employee involvement (TEI) at the organisation level. The business excellence department of Taegutec, a cutting tool manufacturing company in India, implemented various employee participation events with the aim of achieving 70% to challenge the world class manufacturing awards like CII - Exim Bank - Business Excellence Award. Employee involvement on initiatives like 5S, kaizen, QCC, and business excellence models should result in lean projects that help the organisation achieve the world class levels of both the customer and employee satisfaction. Unfortunately, Taegutec was not able to achieve the results and hence management decided to embark on an extensive analysis to identify the cause of poor results of TEI. A descriptive study was developed and results showed that non-availability of a TEI implementation system, lack of awareness levels, weak reward systems, improper and partial implementation of TEI across the various functions of organisations were eventually leading to lack of team work resulting in a culture focused on individuality. An engineering manager can employ the results offered in this article to better prepare their organisations for the implementation of new processes and initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Nagarajan Ramesh & A. Ravi, 2017. "Determinants of total employee involvement: a case study of a cutting tool company," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 221-240.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:11:y:2017:i:2:p:221-240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=81433
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:11:y:2017:i:2:p:221-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.