IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbeaf/v1y2008i1p4-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behaviour and rationality in corporate governance

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver Marnet

Abstract

The agency view of corporate governance requires effective monitors and gatekeepers to align the interests of the agent with those of the principal. One common denominator in recent corporate debacles appears to be the collective failure of gatekeepers and monitors. This paper suggests that conventional proposals to reform corporate governance through legislation, codes of best practice, and the like, are necessary, but underestimate the pressures from conflicts of interest and bias which reputation intermediaries face in their interaction with colleagues and clients. The aim of this paper is to integrate various strands of the literature on corporate governance, cognitive research and behavioural economics to shed light on questions regarding the independence of boards of directors and external auditors.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver Marnet, 2008. "Behaviour and rationality in corporate governance," International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 4-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbeaf:v:1:y:2008:i:1:p:4-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=21027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gérard Charreaux, 2009. "Droit et gouvernance:l’apport du courant comportemental," Working Papers CREGO 1091001, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    2. Gérard Charreaux, 2011. "Quelle théorie pour la gouvernance?De la gouvernance actionnariale à la gouvernance cognitive et comportementale," Working Papers CREGO 1110402, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    3. Dusica STEVCEVSKA SRBINOSKA, 2022. "Audit modifications in emerging markets: The Macedonian Stock Exchange," Romanian Journal of Economics, Institute of National Economy, vol. 55(2(64)), pages 43-69, December.
    4. Saes, Beatriz Macchione & Muradian, Roldan, 2021. "What misguides environmental risk perceptions in corporations? Explaining the failure of Vale to prevent the two largest mining disasters in Brazil," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Anastasia Stepanova & Anastasia Suraeva, 2019. "An Overconfident CEO VS A Rational Board: The Tale About Bank Risk-Taking," HSE Working papers WP BRP 78/FE/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    6. Michel P. Guillemin, 2021. "New Avenues for Prevention of Work-Related Diseases Linked to Psychosocial Risks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-12, October.
    7. Guillaume Plaisance, 2023. "Accountability in French non-profit organizations: between paradox and complexity," Post-Print hal-04430976, HAL.
    8. P. Krishna Prasanna & Anish S. Menon, 2012. "Corporate governance and stock market liquidity in India," International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1/2), pages 24-45.
    9. Hoeppner Sven & Kirchner Christian, 2016. "Ex ante versus Ex post Governance: A Behavioral Perspective," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 227-259, July.
    10. Horan Aidan & Mulreany Michael, 2020. "Corporate governance in the public sector: Reflections on experience in Ireland," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 68(4), pages 121-144, December.
    11. Abdelsalam, Omneya & Dimitropoulos, Panagiotis & Elnahass, Marwa & Leventis, Stergios, 2016. "Earnings management behaviors under different monitoring mechanisms: The case of Islamic and conventional banks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 132(S), pages 155-173.
    12. S. Morteza Ghayour B. & Meysam Doaei, 2012. "A Dialectic Model of Development of Stakeholders¡¯ Theory and Corporate Governance: from Hume Utilitarianism to Aristotelian Virtue Ethics," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(2), pages 96-104, April.
    13. Michel Guillemin & Robin Nicholas, 2022. "Core Values at Work—Essential Elements of a Healthy Workplace," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbeaf:v:1:y:2008:i:1:p:4-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=237 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.