IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbcrm/v7y2017i2p151-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cyber risk analysis and valuation: a new combinatorial models and systems approach

Author

Listed:
  • Phillip King-Wilson

Abstract

Cyber threat assessment requires threat identification and quantification for critical tasks such as risk management, underwriting and regulatory compliance. Traditional risk assessment models are used to determine threats, business impact and probability of a successful attack. However, analysis models exist, external to the IT security sector that can provide input to risk models to improve cloud computing applicability and error rate reduction in threat identification technologies for enhanced accuracy. Cloud computing and virtualisation have changed the cyber threat vector environment. Cloud utilisation options have new risk implications and their architectures require an alternative form of loss modelling to account for the various levels, location and utilisation at which an attack may take place. This paper proposes a combinatorial modelling and systems approach to assessing and valuing cyber threats, based upon the need to satisfy regulatory bodies to financially quantify such threats in an empirical and transparent manner. Epidemiological models for assessing error rates are combined within an extrapolation algorithm for cyber threats, increasing assessment accuracy. A cascading threat multiplier is used to reformulate traditional single loss expectancy risk models.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillip King-Wilson, 2017. "Cyber risk analysis and valuation: a new combinatorial models and systems approach," International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 151-178.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:151-178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=86070
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:151-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=333 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.