IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbcrm/v2y2011i4p330-345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of user participation during the development of crisis management information systems in Tunisian firms

Author

Listed:
  • Senda Jmour Hachicha
  • Hassouna Fedhila

Abstract

Participative decision theory suggests that a development process based on users participation can lead to the success of computerised applications, such as crisis management information systems, developed in the firm. Facing controversies of research results, Igbaria et al. (1996), Anandarajan et al. (2002) and Hartwich and Barki (1994) had suggested that user's involvement has a mediating effect in the relation between users participation and applications success. Lind et al. (1990) and Hunton and Gibson (1999) have introduced the effect of user's cognition on applications success. Therefore, the objective of this research is to examine the mediating effect of user's involvement and user's cognition in the relation between user's participation during the development of the crisis management information systems and the success of these applications. Based on a sample of 50 users of 32 computerised applications, empirical findings show that increasing users' participation during the development of crisis management information systems affect their perceptions of the development process's fairness which improve the use of these systems and enhance users' satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Senda Jmour Hachicha & Hassouna Fedhila, 2011. "Influence of user participation during the development of crisis management information systems in Tunisian firms," International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(4), pages 330-345.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:2:y:2011:i:4:p:330-345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44407
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:2:y:2011:i:4:p:330-345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=333 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.