IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbcrm/v14y2024i4p392-412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of skills, processes and technology in information security risk management

Author

Listed:
  • Peace Kumah
  • Winfred Yaokumah
  • Kwame Okwabi Asante-Offei

Abstract

Managing security resources can be challenging as it is easy to apply too much, too little, or even the wrong security measures, leading to excessive spending and a failure to mitigate risk adequately. This quantitative study analyses the role of security resources (including skills, processes, and technology) in risk management. The study employed a random sampling strategy to collect data from five major industry sectors and conducted a web survey. Three multiple regression analyses were then performed to evaluate the relative significance of skills, processes, and technology in risk assessment and analysis within risk management practices. The results demonstrate that skills, processes, and technology account for 79.9% of the variation in risk assessment, 77.7% in risk analysis, and 85% in overall risk management. Skills and processes played the most significant roles in all models compared to technology. Therefore, organisations should prioritise security skills and processes to improve risk management practices. This study provides a model for examining the importance of security resource management in risk management practices, enhancing our understanding of the security resources that contribute significantly to effective risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Peace Kumah & Winfred Yaokumah & Kwame Okwabi Asante-Offei, 2024. "The role of skills, processes and technology in information security risk management," International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 392-412.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:392-412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=142654
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:392-412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=333 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.