IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbcrm/v14y2024i4p355-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing enterprise security risk management adoption in Kenyan universities: the role of administrative staff commitment

Author

Listed:
  • Levis Omusugu Amuya
  • Peterson Mwai Kariuki

Abstract

This study explores the association between administrative staff commitment and the adoption of enterprise security risk management (ESRM) within accredited universities in Kenya. Drawing on institutional and diffusion of innovation theories, the research emphasises the pivotal role of administrative commitment in institutionalising ESRM. A sample of 42 institutions, comprising 22 public and 20 private universities, was selected from 75 accredited universities. Questionnaire responses from security executives were analysed using Spearman's correlation and ordinal logistic regression. The findings reveal a significant and positive influence of administrative staff commitment on ESRM adoption. The study highlights that commitment from university administrators, accounts for 55.2% of the variance in ESRM adoption, underscoring the need for prioritising security risk management at the institutional level. The findings suggest a strategic approach, urging administrators to integrate ESRM into mission statements and elevate leadership commitment to a policy requirement, thereby advancing effective ESRM institutionalisation in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Levis Omusugu Amuya & Peterson Mwai Kariuki, 2024. "Enhancing enterprise security risk management adoption in Kenyan universities: the role of administrative staff commitment," International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 355-370.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:355-370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=142648
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:355-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=333 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.