IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijassi/v11y2024i4p298-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative cost-benefit analysis of carbon wrapping and concrete jacketing for seismic retrofitting of RCC hospital buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Salman Khursheed
  • Sanika Upasani
  • Virendra Kumar Paul

Abstract

This study evaluates the cost-benefit ratios of carbon wrapping and concrete jacketing as seismic retrofitting techniques for reinforced concrete (RCC) hospital buildings. By reviewing existing literature and case study data, it underscores the efficacy and economic viability of these approaches. Experimental and numerical studies on two RCC hospital structures demonstrate significant improvements in stiffness, strength, and ductility with both techniques. Carbon wrapping is shown to effectively reinforce structures, addressing vulnerabilities and enhancing seismic resilience, while concrete jacketing offers greater economic feasibility in normal and moderately stressed conditions, performing comparably or slightly better in critical limit states. The analysis provides crucial insights for stakeholders, supporting informed decisions that balance structural integrity and cost-effectiveness. This research aims to guide retrofitting efforts by presenting a comprehensive evaluation of the economic and structural benefits of these two techniques, helping decision makers optimise solutions that prioritise both financial and structural outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Salman Khursheed & Sanika Upasani & Virendra Kumar Paul, 2024. "Comparative cost-benefit analysis of carbon wrapping and concrete jacketing for seismic retrofitting of RCC hospital buildings," International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(4), pages 298-310.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijassi:v:11:y:2024:i:4:p:298-310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=143377
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijassi:v:11:y:2024:i:4:p:298-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=205 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.