IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijassi/v10y2023i1p16-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An approach to evaluate service quality in polytechnic education institutes: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Pramod Kinker
  • Rakshit Kumar Singh
  • A.R. Singh
  • Rajeev Jain

Abstract

The aims of the study are to identify and evaluate the quality of service perceived by students and teachers. Hypothesis have been formulated and tested to examine for service quality gaps in of polytechnic education institutes (PEIs) of Madhya Pradesh, India. A Kano methodology has been used to prioritise service quality factors. The SERVQUAL method has been used to identify the gap between service rendered and service as perceived by students and teachers. The hypothesis has been evaluated using statistical tools. It has been reported that there is significant difference between rendered service quality and expectations of students. There is a need of improvement in service quality factors such as academic excellence, library, infrastructure, career counselling, etc. Further, curriculum structure, physical entities, assessment, feedback and reward need to be improved to encourage more enrolment. The study may help polytechnic education planners, policymakers, practitioners, managers and administrators to improve the service quality in PEIs. The proposed study incorporates the expectations of students and teachers for improvement in service quality in PEIs.

Suggested Citation

  • Pramod Kinker & Rakshit Kumar Singh & A.R. Singh & Rajeev Jain, 2023. "An approach to evaluate service quality in polytechnic education institutes: a case study," International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 16-43.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijassi:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:16-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=129064
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijassi:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:16-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=205 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.