IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v32y2025i1p88-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness analysis of largest financial inclusion schemes in India

Author

Listed:
  • Anand Pandey
  • R. Murugesan

Abstract

The present study attempts to evaluate the effectiveness analysis of largest financial inclusion (FI) schemes named as Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) and its impact on FI in India across states. In the paper, a two-dimensional index, Jan Dhan index (JDI), was created using a number of accounts, and deposit parameters for 28 states and 8 union territories1 from 2015 to 2020 to access the status of FI in India. The index was created using the UNDP's methodology for index and applying the min-max method of normalisation and Euclidean distance method. The JDI is a two-dimensional index that captures standardised values of Jan Dhan account and deposit dimensions on the scale of 0 to 1, where 0 indicates lowest presence of Jan Dhan scheme and 1 indicates highest presence of Jan Dhan scheme in FI. The study's finding suggests that most of the high-income states are low in JDI, except few BJP ruled states such as Gujarat and Haryana. On the other hand, the most populated states, or the low-income states such as Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, Assam, and Jharkhand are high in JDI. Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) ruled states and union territories (including Jammu and Kashmir) have positive growth in JDI.

Suggested Citation

  • Anand Pandey & R. Murugesan, 2025. "Effectiveness analysis of largest financial inclusion schemes in India," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 32(1), pages 88-108.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:88-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=143073
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:88-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.