IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v31y2024i1p91-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological biases and contextual factors as the determinants of financial satisfaction: an evidence-based study on individual investment decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Kritika Shukla
  • Vibhash Kumar

Abstract

This research study identifies, confirms, and integrates individual investors' psychographics within the contextual environment framework and the psychological biases. The study investigates the financial satisfaction level of investors and examines its relationship with investment decision-making. We empirically examined the conceptual framework by administering constructed instruments to the investors (n = 405). For examining the structural relationships, we have used covariance-based structural equation modelling (SEM). We have found that contextual factors like brand perception of investment, economic fundamentals, and individual financial needs are positively associated with investor sentiments. Additionally, we established that psychological biases like overconfidence, hindsight, illusion of control, loss aversion, and status quo are positively associated with investors' financial satisfaction. The study's findings suggest that more financially satisfied investors will likely have higher investment volume, higher investment frequency, and lower investment duration. This study's contributions enrich the behavioural finance literature and hold practical relevance for practitioners and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Kritika Shukla & Vibhash Kumar, 2024. "Psychological biases and contextual factors as the determinants of financial satisfaction: an evidence-based study on individual investment decisions," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(1), pages 91-117.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:31:y:2024:i:1:p:91-117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=139314
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:31:y:2024:i:1:p:91-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.