IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v31y2024i1p62-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can we increase the granularity in understanding global value chains? An integration of academic and practice perspectives to enhance future developments

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Bruno Prataviera
  • Davide Bosio
  • Ioannis Koliousis

Abstract

Value chains are increasingly fragmented globally, and companies and governments struggle with understanding where value is added. Both scholars and practitioners developed models, but recent challenges are calling for original approaches to develop instruments to map and evaluate global value chains (GVCs) footprint. We carried out a structured literature review (SLR) to summarise the existing academic knowledge about GVCs mapping and also examined the related practitioners' materials. We then investigated what data sources are currently available to collect data about global trade flows, and involved practitioners in the discussion to collect insights that could improve the current understanding. We aim at offering guidance in this process, highlighting what future directions should be pursued to increase the models' descriptive and explanatory power. For example, customs data is largely available. Original models could be developed, and GVCs could be studied leveraging rich and granular customs data rather than traditional macro-economic data.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Bruno Prataviera & Davide Bosio & Ioannis Koliousis, 2024. "Can we increase the granularity in understanding global value chains? An integration of academic and practice perspectives to enhance future developments," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(1), pages 62-90.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:31:y:2024:i:1:p:62-90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=139333
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:31:y:2024:i:1:p:62-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.