IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v30y2024i3p259-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical trading strategies, returns predictability and relative efficiency: evidence from selected African stock markets

Author

Listed:
  • Kwame Osei-Assibey
  • Mweishö Nene

Abstract

We investigate the performance of several technical trading strategies in the stock markets of selected African economies and utilised the empirical evidence to rank the markets in terms of their efficiencies. The rationale for this study is simple: an asset whose historical prices fluctuate more randomly (relative to other assets) should offer lower profitable opportunities. Our momentum trading strategies (that also controlled for data snooping bias) generated significant number of profits for the Nigerian stock market, relative to the Egyptian and South African stock markets. We attributed our observation to the relationship between financial markets development and efficiency. Using our results, we ranked the South African stock market as relatively the most efficient, followed by the Egyptian and then the least efficient being the Nigerian market. We propose regular relative efficiency assessments across markets and regimes and discuss the benefits of such assessments to investors' and policymakers' decision making processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwame Osei-Assibey & Mweishö Nene, 2024. "Technical trading strategies, returns predictability and relative efficiency: evidence from selected African stock markets," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(3), pages 259-282.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:30:y:2024:i:3:p:259-282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=137616
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:30:y:2024:i:3:p:259-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.