IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v19y2017i6p687-695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capital structure mean reversion: a comparison between Chinese state-owned and private firms

Author

Listed:
  • Tanveer Ahsan
  • Abdur Rub

Abstract

The study follows mean reversion approach and applies different panel unit root tests on a balanced data-set of 8,670 firm-year observations of Chinese non-financial firms, spread over ten years (2003-2012). The objective of the study is to investigate whether the leverage behaviour of Chinese non-financial firms is mean reverting and consequently, to decide between two competing theoretic frameworks (trade-off theory, pecking order theory). Overall panel test results for short term, long term and total leverage support trade-off financing behaviour. Further, the study categorises firms into state-owned and private firms and compares the leverage behaviour of two categories. The results of comparative analysis explain that leverage behaviour of both types of the firms (state-owned firms, private firms) is mean reverting and therefore supports trade-off theory of capital structure. Our study indicates that both types of the Chinese firms (state-owned firms, private firms) follow long-term financing strategy that is very important for the firms operating in an emerging economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanveer Ahsan & Abdur Rub, 2017. "Capital structure mean reversion: a comparison between Chinese state-owned and private firms," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(6), pages 687-695.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:19:y:2017:i:6:p:687-695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=87282
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:19:y:2017:i:6:p:687-695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.