IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v19y2017i3p339-355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does investment style effect portfolio returns: a study on Indian markets

Author

Listed:
  • Arun Kumar Misra
  • Sabyasachi Mohapatra

Abstract

There is significant empirical evidence specifying the effect of size, value and momentum in portfolio pricing. To confirm the effect, the article has attempted to construct long and short term winners and losers portfolios comprising of stocks forming the CNX NIFTY 500. Stocks are classified based on their past performance, book-to-market value and market capitalisation. The resultant portfolios' pricing is empirically assessed using Carhart four-factor model. The current work further evaluates a set of conditioning information contributing to these factors. Based on the findings, the study makes an attempt to evaluate and compare the returns generated due to 'growth', 'value', and 'momentum' investing in the Indian capital market. It further empirically evaluates the effect of size (small minus large market capitalisation stocks), value (stocks with a low price-to-book ratio) versus growth (stocks with a high price-to-book ratio), and momentum (past winners minus past losers) in the pricing of the portfolios. The study has acknowledged that Indian equity market provides significant profits if investors buy stocks with large market capitalisation and sell stocks with small market capitalisation. This finding is in contrast to the finding of Fama-French (1993) and Carhart (1997).

Suggested Citation

  • Arun Kumar Misra & Sabyasachi Mohapatra, 2017. "Does investment style effect portfolio returns: a study on Indian markets," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(3), pages 339-355.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:19:y:2017:i:3:p:339-355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=83962
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:19:y:2017:i:3:p:339-355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.