IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v19y2017i2p239-249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University governance and educational AAU model: an organisational culture approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ghaleb A. El Refae
  • Abdelhafid K. Belarbi

Abstract

The search for an effective and stabled organisational model of governance in order to manage a higher education institution is complex, for governance depends on the nature of an institution's ownership, its paradigm of management and its objective focus. The governance of a higher education institution has become the pillar for managing changes that have brought about the evolvement of the higher education institution's external environment. It is a commonly cited opinion that "managing academics is like herding cats: difficult and ultimately pointless" (McCormarck et al., 2014). This paper aims at focusing on the working management model which has been established at AAU. The developed model is based on applying the Commission for Academic Accreditation (CAA) 2011 Standards of UAE Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. The paper spells out how the CAA standards have been set as the guidelines for advancing the AAU organisational (corporate) culture that steers its managerial governance at all levels of academic and administrative units of the institution. The paper raises the following main inquiries: 1) Does the developed model matter? 2) Could the developed model be adapted to the requirements of international accreditation?

Suggested Citation

  • Ghaleb A. El Refae & Abdelhafid K. Belarbi, 2017. "University governance and educational AAU model: an organisational culture approach," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(2), pages 239-249.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:19:y:2017:i:2:p:239-249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=82592
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:19:y:2017:i:2:p:239-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.