IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v8y2014i3p325-348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Avenues of entry: how industrial engineers and ergonomists access and influence human factors and ergonomics issues

Author

Listed:
  • Cecilia Berlin
  • W. Patrick Neumann
  • Nancy Theberge
  • Roland Örtengren

Abstract

This study compares how Canadian industrial engineers (IEs) and ergonomists 'position themselves' to influence human factors and ergonomics (HFE) issues. The study examined how these stakeholders perceived their influence on HFE issues, constraints they operated under, and strategies used. The results contribute to an understanding of decisions and processes surrounding HFE practices, showing that organisational entry points and stakeholder expectations on IEs and ergonomists affect their influence on HFE issues. Ergonomists influenced HFE issues by leveraging their knowledge of other stakeholders' priorities, and were more dependent on accessing the issue via a 'problem owner'. IEs were often entrusted with greater freedom to act on improvements. Expressing HFE improvements in terms of business benefits was a successful strategy for both. It was found that ergonomists operated as 'partial solution builders', trying to influence the HFE issue as an expert, lobbyist or facilitator. Based on the results, an existing framework was modified. [Received 5 August 2011; Revised 10 October 2011; Revised 28 March 2012; Accepted 30 October 2012]

Suggested Citation

  • Cecilia Berlin & W. Patrick Neumann & Nancy Theberge & Roland Örtengren, 2014. "Avenues of entry: how industrial engineers and ergonomists access and influence human factors and ergonomics issues," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(3), pages 325-348.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:8:y:2014:i:3:p:325-348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=60999
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:8:y:2014:i:3:p:325-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.