IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v7y2013i4p456-474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An automatic method to reach consensus in a local context for AHP group decision making

Author

Listed:
  • Yucheng Dong
  • Weijun Xu
  • Weidong Xu

Abstract

In the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Saaty's consistency index is performed to ensure that the preference information, provided in an individual judgement matrix, is neither random nor illogical. Based on the extension of Saaty's consistency index, this paper proposes a consensus index to measure the difference between the individual preference values and the collective preference value in AHP group decision making. Furthermore, based on the consensus index, we propose a consensus prioritisation method to obtain the collective priority vector for AHP group decision making, and develop a non-linear programme model to automatically reach acceptable consensus in a local context (a unique criterion). The consensus model in this paper can optimally preserve original preference information in reaching acceptable consensus (in some sense). A genetic algorithm also is designed to solve this non-linear programme model. [Received 25 June 2011; Revised 25 August 2011; Revised 7 November 2011; Accepted 2 December 2011]

Suggested Citation

  • Yucheng Dong & Weijun Xu & Weidong Xu, 2013. "An automatic method to reach consensus in a local context for AHP group decision making," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4), pages 456-474.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:7:y:2013:i:4:p:456-474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=55018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:7:y:2013:i:4:p:456-474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.