IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v2y2008i1p35-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forming relationships with stakeholders in engineering projects

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Terje Karlsen

Abstract

For a project manager, it is vital to build good relations with the stakeholders who are identified as being most crucial in the project process and in using the final results of the project. The purpose of this paper is to study relationships in an engineering project setting; more specifically, the focus is on identifying the determining factors that form the relationship between the project and its stakeholders. This paper presents an empirical study based on in-depth interviews following a semistructured approach. Three engineering projects were studied in detail. Results from the current study identified five different types of relationships: classical market; through a third party; open and direct; integrated team; and partnering. Another finding indicates that five different factors have an impact on the formation of the project-stakeholder relationship: trust; uncertainty and control; culture and language; resources and knowledge; and goal congruence. [Received 15 May 2007; Revised 15 August 2007; Accepted 30 August 2007]

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Terje Karlsen, 2008. "Forming relationships with stakeholders in engineering projects," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 35-49.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:2:y:2008:i:1:p:35-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=16328
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan Fu & Gui Ye & Xiaoyu Tang & Qinjun Liu, 2019. "Theoretical Framework for Informal Groups of Construction Workers: A Grounded Theory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-28, November.
    2. Weiping Jiang & Shanqing Tang, 2023. "The Cooperation Establishment Mechanism of EPC Project Consortium in Context of China: Form the Perspective of Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:2:y:2008:i:1:p:35-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.