IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v16y2022i2p169-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mathematical model for the optimal robust design of cause selecting control charts

Author

Listed:
  • Salih O. Duffuaa
  • Ahmed M. Ghaithan
  • Ahmed M. Attia

Abstract

Cause selecting charts (CSC) are statistical control-charts for monitoring multiple sequential processes; in contrast, Shewhart control-charts are useful for monitoring independent processes. The economic-statistical design of CSC involves the selection of the optimal design parameters that include the width of the chart, sample size, and sampling interval. The application of economic-statistical criteria is a well-established and active research field. However, these design approaches may not be reliable for a dynamic production environment due to the uncertainty associated with the values of the model parameters. The purpose of this paper is to develop a robust economic-statistical model for the design of CSC. The model is intended to minimise the risk associated with the incidence of different scenarios in a real production environment. Through the use of examples and sensitivity analysis, it is demonstrated that the model provides design parameters that are more sensitive to shifts, protect against the occurrence of other scenarios, and results in charts with a higher power. [Received: 21 July 2018; Accepted: 24 March 2021]

Suggested Citation

  • Salih O. Duffuaa & Ahmed M. Ghaithan & Ahmed M. Attia, 2022. "A mathematical model for the optimal robust design of cause selecting control charts," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(2), pages 169-193.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:16:y:2022:i:2:p:169-193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=121191
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:16:y:2022:i:2:p:169-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.