IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v14y2020i2p217-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Buffer allocation, equipment selection and line balancing optimisation in unreliable production lines

Author

Listed:
  • Nabil Nahas

Abstract

This paper presents an integrated optimisation model to simultaneously solve buffer allocation, equipment selection and line balancing problems in unreliable production line systems. The considered unreliable serial production line consists of m workstations and m − 1 intermediate buffers. The objective is to maximise the system throughput level. A decomposition method is used to estimate the production line throughput. The decision variables in the formulated optimal design problem are buffer levels, types of equipment and the sets of tasks assigned to the workstations. An efficient algorithm, based on the nonlinear threshold accepting algorithm (NLTA) is proposed to solve this problem. The efficiency of the proposed approach is compared to existing algorithms and first tested on a simple assembly line balancing type-2 problem (SALB-2). Here the objective is to minimise the cycle time with a fixed number of workstations. In the second numerical experiment, the integrated model is solved using the NLTA, and its performance is compared to that of the great deluge algorithm (GDA) through several numerical examples. [Received: 9 June 2018; Revised: 15 September 2018; Revised: 18 April 2019; Accepted: 2 August 2019]

Suggested Citation

  • Nabil Nahas, 2020. "Buffer allocation, equipment selection and line balancing optimisation in unreliable production lines," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(2), pages 217-246.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:14:y:2020:i:2:p:217-246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=105703
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:14:y:2020:i:2:p:217-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.