IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v12y2018i2p233-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimisation of inspection policy for multi-line production systems

Author

Listed:
  • Farhad Zahedi-Hosseini
  • Aris A. Syntetos
  • Philip A. Scarf

Abstract

This paper develops a simulation model to determine the cost-optimum inspection policy for a multi-line production system taking account of simultaneous downtime. The machines in the multi-line system are subject to a two stage failure process that is modelled using the delay-time concept. Our study indicates that: consecutive inspection of lines with priority for failure repair is cost-optimal, with a cost reduction of 61% compared to a 'run-to-failure' policy; and maintainers need to be responsive to operational requirements. Our ideas are developed in the context of a case study of a plant with three parallel lines, one of which is on cold-standby. [Received 13 October 2016; Revised 29 April 2017; Revised 14 December 2017; Accepted 14 December 2017]

Suggested Citation

  • Farhad Zahedi-Hosseini & Aris A. Syntetos & Philip A. Scarf, 2018. "Optimisation of inspection policy for multi-line production systems," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 233-251.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:233-251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=90616
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Lopes, Rodrigo S. & Scarf, Philip A., 2021. "Inspection and replacement policy with a fixed periodic schedule," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:233-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.