IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v12y2018i2p175-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

LP-based working subsets for personnel scheduling: evaluation and augmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. Brusco
  • Tony R. Johns
  • Ray R. Venkataraman

Abstract

This paper evaluates the efficacy of LP-based working subsets for generalised set-covering formulations of personnel scheduling problems and presents a nearest-neighbour augmentation procedure for improving performance. Three experimental studies were completed in the evaluation process. In the first study, the LP-based working subset was sufficient to yield an optimal shift scheduling solution for 85% of the 24,300 test problems and the nearest-neighbour augmentation improved the percentage of optimal solutions to over 98%. The second study focused on more complex cyclic shift scheduling environments that permitted shift length, meal break and relief break flexibility. The adequacy of LP-based working subsets was supported by the provision of optimal shift scheduling solutions for 185 of 189 (98%) of the test problems. The third study examined a challenging tour scheduling environment for which globally-optimal benchmarks are not available. The superiority of the augmented LP-based working subset procedure was nevertheless evident, as it yielded better results than the (non-augmented) LP-based working subset for 92% of the test problems despite being constrained to only 40% of the allowed computation time for the non-augmented subsets. [Received 24 April 2017; Revised 25 August 2017; Revised 17 September 2017; Accepted 6 December 2017]

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. Brusco & Tony R. Johns & Ray R. Venkataraman, 2018. "LP-based working subsets for personnel scheduling: evaluation and augmentation," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 175-198.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:175-198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=90614
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:175-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.