IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v10y2016i4p499-526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automated robotic assembly line design with unavailability periods and tool changes

Author

Listed:
  • Hakan Gultekin
  • Adnan Tula
  • M. Selim Akturk

Abstract

We focus on an assembly line design problem of a fully automated robotic spot-welding line. Different from existing studies, we take the prescheduled unavailability periods, such as lunch and tea breaks, into account in order to reflect a more realistic production environment. This problem includes allocating operations to the stations and satisfying the demand and cycle time within a desired interval for each model to be produced. We also ensure that assignability, precedence, and tool life constraints are met. Furthermore, the existing studies in the literature overlook the limited lives of the tools that are used for production. Tool replacement decisions not only affect the tooling cost, but also the production rate. Therefore, we determine the number of stations and allocate the operations into the stations in such a way that tool change periods coincide with the unavailability periods to eliminate tool change related line stoppages in a mixed model robotic assembly line. We provide a mathematical formulation, propose a two-stage local search algorithm and test the performances of these methods using different problem instances with varying parameters. [Received 12 November 2012; Revised 8 February 2016; Accepted 18 February 2016[

Suggested Citation

  • Hakan Gultekin & Adnan Tula & M. Selim Akturk, 2016. "Automated robotic assembly line design with unavailability periods and tool changes," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 499-526.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:10:y:2016:i:4:p:499-526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=78142
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:10:y:2016:i:4:p:499-526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.