IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v10y2016i4p407-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robustness of retrospective weighted control charts

Author

Listed:
  • Shih-Chou Kao

Abstract

This study considers the construction of control charts when outliers could occur in the data. Simply increasing the width of control limits will make it more difficult to detect an out-of-control signal. This study aims to determine weights for each observation by measuring their respective distances to the average. The study proposes a retrospective weighted average and weighted inter-quartile range (WIQR) control chart based on the normal distribution that accounts for the false alarm rate, special causes, outliers, and a combination of special causes and outliers that might exist within the process. In addition to validating the detection effectiveness of the proposed control charts, this study also compares various average-type and range-type control charts for detecting the outliers and special causes. The proposed control charts show superior detection effectiveness in four tested scenarios compared to other types of control charts. Finally, the study also illustrates the practical application of the control charts for measuring the tensile strength of a deformed bar in coil. [Received 10 February 2014; Revised 21 August 2015; Revised 3 November 2015; Accepted 14 December 2015]

Suggested Citation

  • Shih-Chou Kao, 2016. "Robustness of retrospective weighted control charts," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 407-430.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:10:y:2016:i:4:p:407-430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=78146
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:10:y:2016:i:4:p:407-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.