IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/afasfa/v15y2025i2p143-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The moderating effect of joint audit on the relationship between the readability of financial statements footnotes and audit effort: evidence from Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Reem Shaker
  • Ahmed Zamel
  • Hosam Moubarak
  • Noriaki Okamoto
  • Hebatallah Badawy

Abstract

This research examines the effect of the readability of financial statements footnotes on audit efforts. Furthermore, it examines the moderation role of voluntary joint auditing in this relationship. The results show that generally, auditors respond to complex footnotes by increasing audit efforts through longer audit report lag and higher audit fees. In addition, the findings reveal a significant negative moderation role of joint auditing on the relationship between the readability of footnotes and audit fees, whereas there are no incremental effects of joint auditing on the relationship between readability and audit report lag. This research contributes to the auditing literature by providing evidence on the informativeness of the qualitative characteristics of financial reports to audit engagements. It also represents interdisciplinary business research, using qualitative and quantitative research methods besides connecting linguistics to auditing research.

Suggested Citation

  • Reem Shaker & Ahmed Zamel & Hosam Moubarak & Noriaki Okamoto & Hebatallah Badawy, 2025. "The moderating effect of joint audit on the relationship between the readability of financial statements footnotes and audit effort: evidence from Egypt," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(2), pages 143-174.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:143-174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=144815
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:143-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=214 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.