IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/idp/redpoe/y2016i4p213_222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Nature and Assessment of Systemic Risk in Terms of Liquidity of the Banking System

Author

Listed:
  • Lavreniuk Vladyslav V.

    (Kyiv National Economic University named after V. Hetman)

  • Shevchuk Volodymyr V.

    (Kyiv National Economic University named after V. Hetman)

Abstract

The aim of the article is to determine the nature of systemic risk as a threat to the financial stability of the banking system and develop analytical tools to assess its impact on the banking system in terms of its liquidity. To solve the tasks assigned, there used general scientific and specific methods, such as: logical and dialectical method, mathematical and graphical one. Based on the generalization, analysis and comparison of different interpretations, there clarified the concept of “systemic risk†as a risk generated by financial institutions or individual sectors through the implementation of the mechanism of risk transmission, achieving significant scale of distribution and adversely affecting the stability of the financial system and the real sector of economy. There identified key aspects of systemic risk: a) systemic risk is not a sum of all individual risks of financial institutions; b) spreads through the channels of interconnectedness between financial institutions; c) is a result of accumulated structural imbalances; d) affects the stability of the financial/banking system, public confidence and the real sector of economy. Analytical tools for estimation of the bank’s contribution to the systemic liquidity risk on the basis of which it is determined that the first place in terms of the effect on the aggregate systemic risk of liquidity of the Ukrainian banking system is occupied by banks of Group I, the second place — by Privatbank, the third, fourth, fifth places — by banks in Group II — Oschadbank, Ukreximbank. It is found that it is systemically important state-owned banks that have a significant impact on systemic liquidity risk. It is determined that the probability of default of a leading systemically important bank could result in considerable cumulative losses for the entire banking system and real economy. The prospects of further research are the development of tools for systemic risk assessment with respect to interbank relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Lavreniuk Vladyslav V. & Shevchuk Volodymyr V., 2016. "The Nature and Assessment of Systemic Risk in Terms of Liquidity of the Banking System," The Problems of Economy, RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE), issue 4, pages 213-222.
    • Handle: RePEc:idp:redpoe:y:2016:i:4:p:213_222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.problecon.com/export_pdf/problems-of-economy-2016-4_0-pages-213_222.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smaga, Pawel, 2014. "The concept of systemic risk," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 61214, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arnaud Z. Dragicevic, 2019. "Market Coordination Under Non-Equilibrium Dynamics," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 697-715, September.
    2. Chiara Pederzoli & Costanza Torricelli, 2017. "Systemic risk measures and macroprudential stress tests: an assessment over the 2014 EBA exercise," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 237-251, August.
    3. Alexander M. Karminsky & Ekaterina V. Seryakova, 2019. "Assessment of Cross-Border Transmission of Systemic Financial Risk in EU Countries," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 5, pages 119-129, October.
    4. Christian Kubitza, 2021. "Tackling the Volatility Paradox: Spillover Persistence and Systemic Risk," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 079, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    5. Pera Jacek, 2016. "Evaluation of the Macroeconomic Stability of Central and Eastern European Countries with a View Toward their Membership in the European Union. Multidimensional Risk Analysis," Comparative Economic Research, Sciendo, vol. 19(3), pages 69-92, September.
    6. Hazar Altınbaş & Vincenzo Pacelli & Edgardo Sica, 2022. "An Empirical Assessment of the Contagion Determinants in the Euro Area in a Period of Sovereign Debt Risk," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 8(2), pages 339-371, July.
    7. Łukasz Kurowski & Paweł Smaga, 2018. "Monetary Policy and Cyclical Systemic Risk - Friends or Foes?," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2018(5), pages 522-540.
    8. V. Rasskazov E. & В. Рассказов Е., 2016. "Измерение Финансового Заражения На Примере Моделирования Риска Банковского Дефолта // The Methodology For Measuring Financial Contagion: The Case Study Of Bank Default Risk Simulation," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 20(3), pages 54-61.
    9. repec:prg:jnlpep:v:preprint:id:667:p:1-19 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Xu, Qiuhua & Yan, Haoyang & Zhao, Tianyu, 2022. "Contagion effect of systemic risk among industry sectors in China’s stock market," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    11. Hmissi, Bochra & Bejaoui, Azza & Snoussi, Wafa, 2017. "On identifying the domestic systemically important banks: The case of Tunisia," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1343-1354.
    12. Choe, Geon Ho & Choi, So Eun & Jang, Hyun Jin, 2020. "Assessment of time-varying systemic risk in credit default swap indices: Simultaneity and contagiousness," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    13. Kubitza, Christian & Gründl, Helmut, 2016. "Systemic risk: Time-lags and persistence," ICIR Working Paper Series 20/16, Goethe University Frankfurt, International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR).
    14. Daniel Traian PELE & Alexandra Ioana CONDA & Raul Cristian BAG & Miruna MAZURENCU-MARINESCU-PELE & Vasile Alecsandru STRAT, 2023. "Financial Risk Meter for The Romanian Stock Market," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 5-24, March.
    15. V. Rasskazov E. & В. Рассказов Е., 2016. "Эволюция Эффекта Финансового Заражения В Еврозоне В Период Долгового Кризиса // Evolution Of Financial Contagion In The Context Of The European Debt Crisis," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 20(2), pages 99-105.
    16. Lukasz Prorokowski, 2020. "Macroprudential due-diligence framework for shadow banking entities," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 51(6), pages 587-612.
    17. Adnan Safi & Xianrong Yi & Salman Wahab & Yingying Chen & Hassan Hassan, 2021. "CEO overconfidence, firm-specific factors, and systemic risk: evidence from China," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 30-47, June.
    18. Chiara Pederzoli & Costanza Torricelli, 2017. "Systemic risk measures and macroprudential stress tests: an assessment over the 2014 EBA exercise," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 237-251, August.
    19. Zulu, Thulani & Manguzvane, Mathias Mandla & Bonga-Bonga, Lumengo, 2023. "Assessing the contribution of South African Insurance Firms to Systemic Risk," MPRA Paper 116815, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Tente, Natalia & von Westernhagen, Natalja & Slopek, Ulf, 2017. "M-PRESS-CreditRisk: A holistic micro- and macroprudential approach to capital requirements," Discussion Papers 15/2017, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    21. Badea Irina - Raluca, 2015. "Hrm - Well-Being At Work Relation. A Case Study," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 146-154, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idp:redpoe:y:2016:i:4:p:213_222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Rystenko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.problecon.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.