IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjbm/v13y2014i1p53-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Bank Capitalization Lead to High Liquidity Creation? – Evidence from Nigerian Banking Sector Using Panel Least Square Method

Author

Listed:
  • Taiwo Adewale Muritala
  • Abayomi Samuel Taiwo

Abstract

The study critically examines the impact of capitalization on bank liquidity creation in selected banks of Nigeria using the annual data of 10 banks for the period 2006 to 2010. The results of Levin, Lin and Chu unit root test show that all the variables are non-stationary at level. The results of Panel Least Square (PLS) regression reveal that bank size and capital asset ratio are positively related to bank capital but only bank size is significantly related to bank capital. In addition, the results show that bank liquidity and non-performing/assets ratio have a non-significant negative effect on bank capital. The implication is that better capitalized banks tend to create less liquidity, which supports the ‘financial fragility-crowding out’ hypothesis. This finding has important policy implications for emerging countries like Nigeria as it suggests that bank capital requirements, that is, recapitalization policy, implemented to support financial stability, may harm liquidity creation. The financial regulatory body needs to provide appropriate effective measures to adequately enhance transparent accountability. Measures such as relaxation or elimination of restrictions on profits and capital remittances, opening of formerly ‘priority’ sectors to investors, and provision of adequate security, among others, should be put in place.

Suggested Citation

  • Taiwo Adewale Muritala & Abayomi Samuel Taiwo, 2014. "Does Bank Capitalization Lead to High Liquidity Creation? – Evidence from Nigerian Banking Sector Using Panel Least Square Method," The IUP Journal of Bank Management, IUP Publications, vol. 0(1), pages 53-62, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjbm:v:13:y:2014:i:1:p:53-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjbm:v:13:y:2014:i:1:p:53-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.