IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjar/v07y2008i2p7-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of Individual Taxpayer’s Perception of Tax Practitioners in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Chee-Keong Choong
  • Chue-Qun Tong
  • Kok-Eng Tan

Abstract

The paper examines Malaysian taxpayers’ perceptions of their current tax practitioner as well as the attributes of the ideal tax practitioners that they are looking for. The study shows that gender, age and education level are significantly correlated with the attributes of their ideal tax practitioners. Majority of females, in the age group over 31 years and with higher education level, tend to have high priority for ‘low risk with no fuss’ as compared to males, with lower education level and age group below 31 years who display priority for ‘creative accounting, aggressive tax planning’. Besides, the most welcome kind of tax practitioner is one with ‘low risk with no fuss’ and whom taxpayers categorize as an honest person. This is followed by ‘creative accounting, aggressive tax planning’, where taxpayers seek for a tax practitioner who is familiar with the grey area, clever in tax minimizing and aware of the major areas that Inland Revenue Board (IRB) check on. The last is the ‘cautions minimization of tax’, which is the least popular. Here, the taxpayers want the tax practitioner to help them minimize the tax, but at the same time also warn them against getting involved in tax planning schemes. The findings also indicate that most of the taxpayers are able to engage tax practitioners who have the attributes that they rate as the most important ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Chee-Keong Choong & Chue-Qun Tong & Kok-Eng Tan, 2008. "A Study of Individual Taxpayer’s Perception of Tax Practitioners in Malaysia," The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices, IUP Publications, vol. 0(2), pages 7-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjar:v:07:y:2008:i:2:p:7-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjar:v:07:y:2008:i:2:p:7-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.